Partnership to Improve Patient Care

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission and Priorities
    • Meet the Chairman
    • Steering Committee
    • PIPC Member List
    • Contact
  • The Issues
    • Value Our Health
    • International
    • Where We Stand
    • Value Assessment Frameworks
    • Engaging Patients in Value-Based Payment
    • Patient-Centeredness in Research
  • Resources
    • Advocacy
    • Letters and Comments
    • PCORI Meeting Transcripts
    • Polling
    • Roundtables
    • White Papers
  • Blog
    • PIPC Patients' Blog
    • Chairman's Corner
    • PIPC Weekly Update
    • The Data Mine
  • Newsroom
    • PIPC in the News
    • Press Releases
    • Open Letter: We Deserve a Voice
  • Events
    • PIPC Forum 2022
    • Discrimination & Health Care
    • C & GT Webinar
    • ICER COVID Webinar
    • Value Our Health Briefing
    • QALY Briefing
    • QALY Panel
    • Past Webinars >
      • ICER SCD Webinar
      • VOH Sickle Cell Webinar
      • Rare Disease Webinar
      • QALY Webinar
      • PCORI Advocacy Webinar
      • APM Webinar
      • Patient Empowerment Webinar
      • Value Assessments Briefing
    • Past PIPC Forums >
      • 2021
      • 2020
      • 2019
      • 2018
      • 2017
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • 2013
      • 2012
      • 2011
      • 2010
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission and Priorities
    • Meet the Chairman
    • Steering Committee
    • PIPC Member List
    • Contact
  • The Issues
    • Value Our Health
    • International
    • Where We Stand
    • Value Assessment Frameworks
    • Engaging Patients in Value-Based Payment
    • Patient-Centeredness in Research
  • Resources
    • Advocacy
    • Letters and Comments
    • PCORI Meeting Transcripts
    • Polling
    • Roundtables
    • White Papers
  • Blog
    • PIPC Patients' Blog
    • Chairman's Corner
    • PIPC Weekly Update
    • The Data Mine
  • Newsroom
    • PIPC in the News
    • Press Releases
    • Open Letter: We Deserve a Voice
  • Events
    • PIPC Forum 2022
    • Discrimination & Health Care
    • C & GT Webinar
    • ICER COVID Webinar
    • Value Our Health Briefing
    • QALY Briefing
    • QALY Panel
    • Past Webinars >
      • ICER SCD Webinar
      • VOH Sickle Cell Webinar
      • Rare Disease Webinar
      • QALY Webinar
      • PCORI Advocacy Webinar
      • APM Webinar
      • Patient Empowerment Webinar
      • Value Assessments Briefing
    • Past PIPC Forums >
      • 2021
      • 2020
      • 2019
      • 2018
      • 2017
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • 2013
      • 2012
      • 2011
      • 2010

The PIPC Blog

PIPC Weekly Update - February 22, 2016

2/22/2016

 
In This Week’s Issue:
1. Wall Street Journal: If Only Health Care Would Focus On This One Thing, click here to view the article. 
2. Modern Healthcare: Hard Work Ahead on Adopting Uniform Quality Measures, click here to view the article. 
3. AHRQ Solicits Public Input on Patient Engagement and Other Quality Measures, click here to view the announcement. 
4. For Physician Quality Measures, CMS Has Received the Message: Simpler is Better, click here to view the article.
5. HealthExec: Study Examines First 6 Rounds of PCORI Funding, click here to view the article. 
6. PCORI Videos: Changing the Conversation on Healthcare Research; Beyond Funding Research, click here and here to view the videos.
7. Medpage: Coalition of Healthcare Leaders Urges 6 Key Reforms, including Patient Engagement, click here to view article.
1. Wall Street Journal: If Only Health Care Would Focus On This One Thing
​

As Dr. Gurpreet Dhaliwal of UC San Francisco commented last week in the Wall Street Journal, “Health care’s ‘quadruple aim’ calls for doing better with patients, quality, cost and clinicians. But when everything is important, then nothing is. To transform itself, health care needs to pick one aim as a so-called ‘keystone habit.’ … In health care, our keystone habit should be taking the patient’s perspective. If we could develop the habit of always seeing health care from the perspective of the patient, we would have one guiding principle – not four – for the tough decisions and trade-offs that need to be made as we reform health care. How long should patients have to wait to make an appointment? It is worth investing in email communication systems with patients? If the response is governed by balancing patient experience, quality measurements, costs considerations and worker satisfaction, the answer gets complicated. If instead we habitually ask, ‘What do I want when I’m a patient?’ the answer is clear… Health care needs to be redesigned so that patients’ health and experience comes first. That’s where the first dollars should go, not the last ones.” Click here to view the article. 

2. Modern Healthcare: Hard Work Ahead on Adopting Uniform Quality Measures

An article in Modern Healthcare reported last week that “for more than a year, top officials from Medicare, the nation's largest health plans, medical societies and major employer and consumer groups hammered away at a dreadful task: Get everyone to agree to use identical quality measures for the treatment of heart disease, cancer and other common conditions. Previous attempts have failed, but this one did not. Participants of this effort, called the Core Measure Quality Collaborative , announced the first fruits of their work on Tuesday. Now the real negotiations begin… Whether the new standards are widely adopted will depend on public rulemaking and the degree to which standards are included in contracts hammered out by health plans, physicians and hospitals. Though widely endorsed, the switch to the consensus measures in commercial plans is voluntary… Policymakers, industry officials, consumer advocates and quality experts are all embracing the new standards as an important step. But they also agree that much more research is needed to improve and expand the quality metrics used in healthcare. ‘This was essentially the first cut,’ [Aenta’s Andrew] Baskin said… Another reason so many different quality metrics are in play is that insurers and doctors try to incorporate measures that reflect the needs of a particular patient population or drive certain quality improvement efforts.” Click here to view the article. 

3. AHRQ Solicits Public Input on Patient Engagement and Other Quality Measures

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) requests information from the public about quality improvement measures designed for health care organizations to monitor initiatives aimed at: (1) improving patient understanding of health information; (2) simplifying navigation of health care systems and facilities and; (3) enhancing patients’ ability to manage their health.

AHRQ is interested in measures that do not require patient survey data that organizations are currently using or have used in the past. The agency is also interested in information about measures under development or that are suggested for future development. Quality improvement measures should belong to one of the following domains: (1) Communication, (2) Ease of Navigation, (3) Patient Engagement and Self-Management, and (4) Organizational Structure, Policy, and Leadership.

The Request for Measures, AHRQ says, is part of a broader project that seeks to identify existing measures related to the four above domains and to establish a set of measures for more formal development and testing. Input on the measures is solicited from public stakeholders including “health care delivery organizations, health information developers, payers, quality measure developers, clinicians, and health care consumers.” Comments are due by March 4, 2016.  Click here to view the announcement. 

4. For Physician Quality Measures, CMS Has Received the Message: Simpler is Better

As Healthcare Informatics editor Rajiv Leventhal commented last week, “I recently read a fantastic article in the New England Journal of Medicine about standardizing patient outcome measures, with the broad purpose of the piece to urge federal healthcare bodies to agree on and implement streamlined patient outcome measures for each medical condition. Indeed, the authors of the piece [a]ttested that as healthcare shifts from the volume of services delivered to the value created for patients, measurement of outcomes that matter to patients, aside from survival, still remains limited. They noted that of the 1,958 quality indicators in the National Quality Measures Clearinghouse, for example, only 139 (7 percent) actually measure outcomes, and only 32 (less than 2 percent) measure patient-reported outcomes. Defaulting to measurement of discrete processes is understandable, given the historical organization of healthcare delivery around specialty services and fee-for-service payments, the authors wrote… In a teleconference call announcing the [Core Measure Quality] Collaborative on Feb. 16, [CMS’ Andy] Slavitt said, per media reports, ‘People in healthcare universally ask for one thing: simplify, simplify, simplify.’ Finally, as the NEJM authors unintentionally foreshadowed, simplification could be upon us.” Click here to view the article. 

5. HealthExec: Study Examines First 6 Rounds of PCORI Funding

Michael Walter reported last week in HealthExec, “‘Primary care is the cornerstone of where patients seek care, accounting for fully 50 percent of all doctor's visits,’ Daniel Merenstein, MD, GUMC director of research programs in the department of family medicine, said in  a prepared statement.  ‘We've reported data that at times showed PCORI funding is clearly supporting its mission of impacting the patient care experience, while other data pointed towards funding not supportive of that mission. Overall the record we are seeing from PCORI is a mixed bag, and while we're not shocked that primary care is not better represented, it's still very disappointing,’ Merenstein said in the same statement.” Click here to view the article. 

6. PCORI Videos: Changing the Conversation on Healthcare Research; Beyond Funding Research

“PCORI has created a cultural shift in healthcare research, away from merely interesting questions toward important ones. Danielle Lavallee, PhD, PharmD, a researcher at the University of Washington and recipient of a Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Award, talks about how PCORI is changing conversations for researchers.” Click here to view the video.

“The Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards focus on elements critical to patient-centered research that aren't research itself, explains Danielle Lavallee, PhD, PharmD, a researcher at the University of Washington.” Click here to view the video. 

7. Medpage: Coalition of Healthcare Leaders Urges 6 Key Reforms, Including Patient Engagement

Medpage Today reports that some basic health system reforms -- including better care planning, increased patient engagement, and improved interoperability -- can and should be implemented immediately, according to the Healthcare Leadership Council (HLC).  The council -- a diverse coalition of payers, providers, patient advocates, and vendors -- released a report outlining six "viable solutions" for improving the healthcare system.  Click here to view the article.

Comments are closed.

    Topics

    All
    Alternative Payment Models
    Chairman's Corner
    Patient Centered Research
    PIPC In The News
    PIPC Patient Blog
    PIPC Weekly Update
    Press Releases
    The Data Mine
    Value Frameworks

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    February 2012
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    May 2011
    March 2011
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    December 2009
    September 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008

About PIPC
The Issues
Resources
Blog
In the News
Press Releases
Contact Us
100 M Street, SE – Ste. 750
Washington, DC 20003