Partnership to Improve Patient Care

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission and Priorities
    • Meet the Chairman
    • Steering Committee
    • PIPC Member List
    • Contact
  • The Issues
    • Action Center
    • Value Our Health
    • International
    • Where We Stand
    • Value Assessment Frameworks
    • Engaging Patients in Value-Based Payment
    • Patient-Centeredness in Research
  • Resources
    • Advocacy
    • Letters and Comments
    • PCORI Meeting Transcripts
    • Polling
    • Roundtables
    • White Papers
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • PIPC in the News
    • PIPC Weekly Update
    • PIPC Patients' Blog
    • Chairman's Corner
    • The Data Mine
  • Events
    • Nevada AB 259
    • QALY Panel
    • QALY Briefing
    • Past Webinars >
      • MFN/IPI Webinar 2025
      • Discrimination & Health Care
      • C & GT Webinar
      • ICER COVID Webinar
      • Value Our Health Briefing
      • ICER SCD Webinar
      • VOH Sickle Cell Webinar
      • Rare Disease Webinar
      • QALY Webinar
      • PCORI Advocacy Webinar
      • APM Webinar
      • Patient Empowerment Webinar
      • Value Assessments Briefing
    • Past PIPC Forums >
      • 2023
      • 2022
      • 2021
      • 2020
      • 2019
      • 2018
      • 2017
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • 2013
      • 2012
      • 2011
      • 2010
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission and Priorities
    • Meet the Chairman
    • Steering Committee
    • PIPC Member List
    • Contact
  • The Issues
    • Action Center
    • Value Our Health
    • International
    • Where We Stand
    • Value Assessment Frameworks
    • Engaging Patients in Value-Based Payment
    • Patient-Centeredness in Research
  • Resources
    • Advocacy
    • Letters and Comments
    • PCORI Meeting Transcripts
    • Polling
    • Roundtables
    • White Papers
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • PIPC in the News
    • PIPC Weekly Update
    • PIPC Patients' Blog
    • Chairman's Corner
    • The Data Mine
  • Events
    • Nevada AB 259
    • QALY Panel
    • QALY Briefing
    • Past Webinars >
      • MFN/IPI Webinar 2025
      • Discrimination & Health Care
      • C & GT Webinar
      • ICER COVID Webinar
      • Value Our Health Briefing
      • ICER SCD Webinar
      • VOH Sickle Cell Webinar
      • Rare Disease Webinar
      • QALY Webinar
      • PCORI Advocacy Webinar
      • APM Webinar
      • Patient Empowerment Webinar
      • Value Assessments Briefing
    • Past PIPC Forums >
      • 2023
      • 2022
      • 2021
      • 2020
      • 2019
      • 2018
      • 2017
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • 2013
      • 2012
      • 2011
      • 2010

The PIPC Blog

Chairman's Corner: Chairman Coelho Testifies in Oregon Against Use of QALYs

11/18/2022

 
Picture
This blog was adapted from testimony delivered by PIPC Chairman Tony Coelho to Oregon's Health Evidence Review Commission (HERC) on November 17, 2022.

​Thank you for allowing me to testify again today. I want to start by saying I appreciate that the commission chose not to vote today on a policy to use the quality-adjusted life year.

 
Based on the meeting last month, it is clear to me that this commission can learn much from the representatives of patients and people with disabilities here that are the real experts.
 
If the commission has not already reviewed the work on this issue from the National Council on Disability – an independent federal agency advising Congress and the Administration on disability policy issues – I would highly recommend doing that before voting.
 
As I mentioned last month, there are federal laws that bar health care discrimination.
 
When HHS first reviewed the Oregon waiver application in 1992, the waiver was rejected because of its use of quality-adjusted life years which would violate the Americans with Disabilities Act which had just passed in 1990.
 
As the original author of that law, I agreed with HHS.
 
Since then, the Affordable Care Act explicitly barred the use of QALYs in Medicare.
 
And more recently the Inflation Reduction Act included language barring the use of evidence that devalues patients and people with disabilities in its considerations about the value of prescription drugs.
 
It is settled law that QALYs cannot influence Medicare decisions and frankly I think -  based on the 1992 decision from HHS - it is settled law that QALYs cannot influence Medicaid decisions.
 
With regard to your consideration of Option 1, I still do not understand the point of using QALYs as proposed.
 
When comparing treatments for the same population, comparative clinical effectiveness research measures clinical and other patient outcomes.
 
There is no need for QALY-based cost effectiveness analyses to understand the clinical impact of different treatments on the same condition.
 
I still maintain that Option 2 should be a non-starter.
 
There is no part of a study using the quality-adjusted life year that is not influenced by the discriminatory nature of that metric.
 
When quality-adjusted life years are used to build the base economic model, all other findings and assumptions in that report are based on that model – even if QALYs are not named in the other report sections.
 
You may be thinking about the metric called the equal value of life year gained that ICER includes in some of its value assessment reports.
​
But even as its supporters in the researcher community point out, the “evLYG measure has its own discriminatory implications.”
 
It fails to account for symptom and quality of life improvements and ignores key aspects of value that are important to patients, and that are important to different degrees for different patients.
 
It does not accurately capture quality of life for patients.
 
The same discriminatory evidence is factored into the evLYG – it is not a solution.
 
I am still surprised Option 2 is on the table.
 
Redacting mention of QALYs in a report only hides its consideration from the public eye.
 
For many years, I used Oregon as the example of a state that did not use QALYs only to find out later that the state was using them and doing it behind closed doors.
 
This is precisely what disability rights laws were written to prevent.
 
I am going to repeat what I said in October. I have epilepsy and I understand stigma. When I was young, my condition meant I could not get a job, the Catholic church thought I was possessed by the devil, and my parents stood by the church – not me.
 
The ADA was enacted to counter that bias and stigma for future generations.  Combined with other disability rights laws, there is no question that metrics like QALYs are not fit for use in our health system.
 
I urge this commission to do the right thing and end its use of QALYs.
 
Thank you for allowing me to speak.

Comments are closed.

    Topics

    All
    Alternative Payment Models
    Chairman's Corner
    Patient Centered Research
    PIPC In The News
    PIPC Patient Blog
    PIPC Weekly Update
    Press Releases
    The Data Mine
    Value Frameworks

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    February 2012
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    May 2011
    March 2011
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    December 2009
    September 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.